User Tools

Site Tools


as3935

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
as3935 [2024/04/12 04:57] riveras3935 [2024/07/25 22:33] (current) – [Calibration] river
Line 47: Line 47:
 A badly designed, pulled, aged, uncompensated crystal oscillator might be 50ppm off, so much better than needed as a calibration standard for this application. Therefore can use a µC to calibrate it automatically. I don't see this done in the Sparkfun library even though it seems obvious. A badly designed, pulled, aged, uncompensated crystal oscillator might be 50ppm off, so much better than needed as a calibration standard for this application. Therefore can use a µC to calibrate it automatically. I don't see this done in the Sparkfun library even though it seems obvious.
  
-The chip can the calibrate its clocks from the above value, so antenna should be trimmed first.+The chip can then calibrate its clocks from the above value, so antenna should be trimmed first.
 Clocks calibration must be repeated after power loss. Clocks calibration must be repeated after power loss.
  
Line 197: Line 197:
  
 Over the next hours I noticed the capacitance drifted back down again, needing more from the trimcaps. Maybe board drying out or cooling down? The next day it was using 96pF or 88pF trimcaps. Over the next hours I noticed the capacitance drifted back down again, needing more from the trimcaps. Maybe board drying out or cooling down? The next day it was using 96pF or 88pF trimcaps.
 +
 +Next day, added 51pF. Now it gets: Trimcap: 0pF, Error: -134 Hz, -0.0%
 +
 +Also added 22uF ceramic to power socket pins, and 1nF from IRQ to ground. Removed electrolytic. Also modified µC board - added bigger 3.3V regulator with ceramic caps and 470uF input cap.
 +
 +Get occasional QRM reports but nothing like without any caps that started with.
  
 ===== Noise ===== ===== Noise =====
Line 216: Line 222:
 (Not extensively tested, maybe reading other registers works too.) (Not extensively tested, maybe reading other registers works too.)
  
-I read than some boards have wrong tuning caps. I couldn't find anything about cap values in the datasheet, but one website suggested 680pF + 270pF = 950pF, which looks about right, maybe a bit small. My DFRobot board has 470pF x 2 = 940uF, according to the schematic anyway, which seems to be a bit too little. +I read that some boards have wrong tuning caps. I couldn't find anything about cap values in the datasheet, but one website suggested 680pF + 270pF = 950pF, which looks about right, maybe a bit small. My DFRobot board has 470pF x 2 = 940uF, according to the schematic anyway, which seems to be a bit too little.
  
 ===== Links ===== ===== Links =====
as3935.1712897831.txt.gz · Last modified: 2024/04/12 04:57 by river

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki